Open & affordable
Core conference management — submissions, review, registration, program and proceedings — is free for academic and non-profit events. No per-paper fees, no surprise upgrades, no paywalled essentials.
ConferenceOS brings the depth of serious peer review together with the polish of a modern attendee experience — so program committees, organizers and authors get the best of both, without the price tag or the dated interfaces.
Our story
ConferenceOS was created by BdREN — Bangladesh Research and Education Network — the national network connecting universities, research institutes and laboratories across the country. Working alongside the academics we serve, we kept hearing the same frustration: running a conference meant choosing between systems that were expensive, systems that felt a decade out of date, or both.
Tools like EasyChair, Microsoft CMT, Ex Ordo and OpenReview each solve real problems, and many committees rely on them. But organizers told us they wanted one platform that handled the whole lifecycle — call for papers, double-blind review, registration and payments, scheduling, hybrid delivery and published proceedings — without forcing a trade-off between rigor and a decent experience for the people actually using it.
So we set out to combine peer-review depth with a genuinely modern attendee experience: the careful conflict-of-interest handling and reviewer workflows that serious venues demand, paired with fast, accessible, multilingual interfaces for authors, reviewers and delegates. And because we believe access to good tooling shouldn't depend on a department's budget, the core is free for academic and non-profit events.
What we stand for
These values shape the product roadmap, the defaults we ship and the way we work with the communities we serve.
Core conference management — submissions, review, registration, program and proceedings — is free for academic and non-profit events. No per-paper fees, no surprise upgrades, no paywalled essentials.
Every workflow is designed by people who have chaired tracks, herded reviewers and chased camera-ready deadlines. Defaults that respect the realities of program committees, not generic event software.
Double-blind by default, with rigorous conflict-of-interest handling, reviewer bidding and audit trails. Author and reviewer identities are protected at every step of the process.
We develop on a public roadmap and welcome feedback from the communities we serve. When the people running conferences shape the tool, the tool actually fits the work.
Our convictions
The standards a platform sets quietly become the norms of a field. We take that responsibility seriously.
Good review is careful, anonymous where it should be, and accountable where it must be. Software should make thoughtful reviewing easier — clean assignment, honest conflict checks, structured rebuttals — never reduce it to a checkbox.
Transparent process, persistent records and accessible proceedings serve research better than closed silos. We support the spectrum from double-blind to fully open review, so each community can choose the model that fits its field.
At a glance
From the first call for papers to the final published proceedings — built to scale from a single workshop to a multi-track international conference.
Integrated modules, from CFP to proceedings
Review modes: double-blind, single-blind & open
Interface languages out of the box
Free for academic & non-profit events
Set up your call for papers in minutes, invite your committee, and run rigorous review without the cost. Free for academic and non-profit events.